ABSOLUTE MUST SEE: Kyle Clement and the Flow of Grace Retreat – MARTIN LUTHER DIABOLICALLY INFLUENCED – Minute 1h 11 mn
LUTERO – Ni el 31 de octubre clavó nada en la puerta de iglesia alguna. https://www.infocatolica.com/blog/delapsis.php/1110311159-lutero-clavo-un-clavito-pero
https://www.infocatolica.com/blog/delapsis.php/1110311159-lutero-clavo-un-clavito-pero
Ni «eppur si muove» es de Galileo; ni «in dubiis libertas» de San Agustín
https://www.infocatolica.com/blog/delapsis.php/1103210319-ni-leppur-si-mouver-es-de-gal
John Calvin, the Gnostic Protestant? – How does John Calvin treat the Bible? The answer helped make me Catholic.
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/john-calvin-the-gnostic-protestant
John Calvin – Protestant Reformer
b. at Noyon in Picardy, France, July 10, 1509, and d. at Geneva, May 27, 1564
https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/john-calvin
John Calvin, the False Optimist
Calvin says we can’t resist God’s grace. Catholics know better.
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/gods-resistible-grace
Trapped in the Mind of John Calvin
If you look at how John Calvin defends his take on Christianity, you’ll find the results are less than impressive.
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/trapped-in-the-mind-of-john-calvin
Calvinism – System of theological thought stemming from John Calvin
https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/calvinism
John Wycliffe
https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/john-wyclif
The Myth of Protestant Bible Martyrs
https://www.catholic.com/audio/cot/the-myth-of-protestant-bible-martyrs
In the 1370s, a dissenting Catholic priest named John Wycliffe became involved in a translation of the Bible in the middle English that was completed in 1382. He died of a stroke in 1384, so he wasn’t a martyr for the Bible. In fact, Wycliffe’s translation came under fire because of his heresies such as denying Christ’s real presence in the Eucharist and his association with the proto Protestant lollard movement…
…
What we see during this period is not a church that burns people at the stake merely for having vernacular scriptures. Instead, there are a few regions where vernacular translations are restricted or subject to review because of an acute heretical movement that relied on them. Aaron de himself even praised the queen for owning personal copies of the gospel. According to Van Lear, it was not the possession of a vernacular Bible as such, but who owned it and whether they were associated with heretical movements that irked the church authorities. A number of provincial counsels issued edicts and injunctions against vernacular translations. They seem to have been more concerned with the spread of heresy than with the vernacular Bible as such. Now it is fair to point out that some church leaders may have overreacted with their rules withholding scripture in order to prevent heresy while other church leaders underacted when it came to providing their own vernacular translations to help the faithful.
But that’s a far cry from the common view among some Protestants that the church chained up bibles to keep people from reading them and executed those who published them In the vernacular, Bibles were chained in churches so that everyone could read them. It was so they wouldn’t be stolen. Protestants also like to cite Jan Hus as a Bible martyr and he was executed for heresy in 1415, but in his article, why was Jan Hus burned at the stake during the Council of Constance? Thomas Fudge never mentions Bible translation as one of Huss crimes. The Dresden Bible written in Czech had already been published in the 1370s. Instead, Huss was executed for his theological heresies, which included many of wycliffe’s errors and a form of donatism that claimed sacraments administered by sinful clerics were invalid. Finally, there’s William Tindale who’s known for his English Bible translation, which included several anti-Catholic notes…
…
But what about the former point of punishing heresy like the need for regulating Bible translations? I think most conservative Protestants would agree the church should regulate doctrine and combat heresy. For example, if a member of your congregation starts leading other people to believe Jesus is not fully God and that person won’t recant his beliefs, then you’d ask him to leave your church to be disfellowshipped, which Catholics call excommunication until the person repent of his heresy. Now, a Protestant might agree, but say they reject executing heretics, which is what the Catholic church did in the Middle Ages, but that wasn’t unique to Catholicism. John Calvin had Michael Cerveti burned at the stake for his Trinitarian heresies. The Lutheran theologian, Philip Maldon published a pamphlet signed by Martin Luther, which concluded of the Anabaptist that in some cases quote, the stubborn sectaries must be put to death.
Catholicism should not be rejected because the church was involved in the execution of heretics. By that logic, many Protestant denominations would have to be rejected as well as the Bible itself because it authorizes executing heretics. Deuteronomy 1820 says, any prophet presumes to speak in my name, a word that I have not commanded the prophet to speak or who speaks in the name of other gods that prophet shall die…
The Protestants Who Came Before the Protestants
The Protestant Reformation is usually attributed to figures like Martin Luther and John Calvin. But they had to get their inspiration from somewhere.
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/the-protestants-who-came-before-the-protestants
Martin Luther – Founder of Protestantism
b. at Eisleben, November 10, 1483; d. at Eisleben, February 18, 1546
https://www.catholic.com/encyclopedia/martin-luther
8 Myths about Martin Luther and The Reformation
https://www.catholic.com/audio/sp/painfully-common-historical-misconceptions-about-martin-luther
Leo and Luther—The Real Story of the Pope and the Heretic
Martin Luther’s Most Shocking Opponent
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/martin-luthers-most-shocking-opponent
Was Martin Luther the Most Evil Man?
https://www.catholic.com/video/was-martin-luther-the-most-evil-man
Catholics vs Protestants – 18 Differences
10 Differences between Catholics and Protestants
Protestant Traditions You Won’t Find in the Bible
https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/protestant-traditions-you-wont-find-in-the-bible
Lutero clavó un clavito, pero qué clavito clavó
https://www.infocatolica.com/blog/delapsis.php/1110311159-lutero-clavo-un-clavito-pero
Lutero, gran hereje
https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=opinion&cod=1578
Was Martin Luther the Most Evil Man?
https://www.catholic.com/video/was-martin-luther-the-most-evil-man
CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: Martin Luther
New Advent
https://www.newadvent.org › cathen
Leader of the great religious revolt of the sixteenth century in Germany; born at Eisleben, 10 November, 1483; died at Eisleben, 18 February, 1546.
https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09438b.htm
Protestant founders
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Calvin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Hus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wycliffe
John Wycliffe
John Wycliffe (/ˈwɪklɪf/; also spelled Wyclif, Wickliffe, and other variants; c. 1328 – 31 December 1384) was an English scholastic philosopher, Christian reformer, Catholic priest, and a theology professor at the University of Oxford. Wycliffe is traditionally believed to have advocated or made a vernacular translation of the Vulgate Bible into Middle English, though more recent scholarship has minimalized the extent of his advocacy or involvement for lack of direct contemporary evidence
On 17 November 1382, Wycliffe was summoned before a synod at Oxford. He still commanded the favour of the court and of Parliament, to which he addressed a memorial. In 1383 he was summonsed to Rome, but he suffered a debilitating stroke and was excused from travel. He was neither excommunicated then, nor deprived of his living.
Who Was the Real Martin Luther?
A biographical sketch of the spark that lit the Reformation.
https://www.ncregister.com/commentaries/who-was-the-real-martin-luther
Who Was Martin Luther?
El cisma luterano no era religión, era nacionalismo germánico: tesis de María Elvira Roca en El País
Martin Luther vs. St. Therese: Debunking the Myths of Reformation vs. Revolt – Explaining the Faith
The Perfidious Revival of Martin Luther (Part 4) | The Fatima Center
Servant of God Maria Serafina del Sacro Cuore di Gesu Micheli (ne Clotilde), Italian foundress of the Institute of Sisters of the Angels (1849-1911). “While she was in Epfendorf – on 10 November 1883 – she passed through to find a church for her to reflect in and found a church that she failed to realize was in fact a Protestant church. Her Guardian Angel came to her and said: Arise for this is a Protestant church. But I want to make you see the place where Martin Luther was condemned and the pain he suffered as a punishment for his pride”; Micheli saw demons who had forced Luther to his knees and confirmed he was consigned to the fires of Hell.”
https://www.ewtnnews.com/vatican/twelve-move-closer-to-sainthood?redirectedfrom=cna
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clotilde_Micheli
https://es.catholic.net/op/articulos/37225/enviado37225.html#modal
MARTIN LUTERO, está en el infierno según vidente, y así es como murió
«Lutero se ha paseado por la historia inmune a la verdad, a los hechos y a la lógica». Alentó la violencia brutal al servicio de los príncipes alemanes
María Elvira Roca Barea, filóloga y autora de «Imperiofobia y Leyenda Negra», ha escrito un artículo en El País en el que revela la realidad sobre la figura de Martín Lutero, desmontando los mitos buenistas en torno a su persona.
https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=noticia&cod=29990
Martín Lutero: mitos y realidades
Las celebraciones en torno al quinto centenario del cisma luterano, que impulsó el monje agustino, obvian los aspectos más oscuros de su figura y legado. El manto religioso oculta un conflicto político y nacionalista
https://www.infocatolica.com/?t=opinion&cod=29989